From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 14:54:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C5716A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED7343D60 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CcmAb-000LQL-OS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:57 +0000 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iBAEsvx2075291 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:57 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id iBAEsujh075290 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:56 GMT Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:56 +0000 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041210145456.GB74945@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: When to use 'portupgrade -R' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:59 -0000 I've run into some problems using 'portupgrade -R' so I'm wondering if just using 'portupgrade' is good enough in most cases. I don't want a port to be upgraded without NECESSARY dependencies, but I don't want minor upgrades done UNNECESSARILY that might cause inconsistencies in the database. jm --