From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 16 21:05:32 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1DB16A4DA;
	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF0A43D45;
	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9E2085;
	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22892082;
	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 9D17633C31; Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx>
References: <44B7715E.8050906@suutari.iki.fi>
	<20060714154729.GA8616@psconsult.nl> <44B7D8B8.3090403@suutari.iki.fi>
	<20060716182315.GC3240@insomnia.benzedrine.cx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20060716182315.GC3240@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> (Daniel
	Hartmeier's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:23:15 +0200")
Message-ID: <86y7utgt0o.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>,
	freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot,
	/etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:05:32 -0000

Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> writes:
> Hence, a "default block" switch or compile time option _within_ pf is
> not going to make any difference.

Sure it will, if pf is compiled into the kernel or loaded by the BTX
loader.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no