From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 29 18:04:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A8B16A469 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outM.internet-mail-service.net (outM.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3C713C4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:03:58 -0700 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BD012684D; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <472620AD.8070905@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:04:29 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <47241E9C.7000605@elischer.org> <472551FE.3020703@elischer.org> <38C11A33-7BA8-46DF-A9DB-E7677DF41885@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <38C11A33-7BA8-46DF-A9DB-E7677DF41885@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: learned something about coretemp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:04:28 -0000 Rui Paulo wrote: > > On 29 Oct 2007, at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 10/28/07, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> never kldload it on an 8 year old system. >>>> >>>> *bewm* >>>> >>>> I presume that my 8 YO inspiron 7500 doesn't have whatever is needed, >>>> but, "*Bewm*" is probably a less than optimal reaction. >>> That has been reported in the past. It's Intel's fault, not ours. >>> The spec says that if you issue a CPUID you should be able to tell if >>> the CPU has the temperature sensors regardless of the CPU model, but >>> on old systems these CPUID call "returns true". >> >> maybe we should just return true to part of the mail seems missing.. I think it went on something like: ...the startup routines for this module only of the cpu seems new enough. > > I'm sorry, but what do you mean? > > -- > Rui Paulo