From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 30 13:54:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E8C37B4EB for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itesec.hsc.fr (itesec.hsc.fr [192.70.106.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B2643E4A for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yb@sainte-barbe.org) Received: from taz.hsc.fr (ogoun.hsc.fr [192.70.106.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "taz.hsc.fr", Issuer "HSC CA" (verified OK)) by itesec.hsc.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E4E20F84 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:54:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by taz.hsc.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5922283; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:53:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:53:59 +0200 From: Yann Berthier To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: snmp port Message-ID: <20020830205359.GA452@hsc.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Herve Schauer Consultants X-Web: http://www.hsc.fr/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi list, I wrote to the maintainer of the net/net-snmp port 2 weeks ago, but he must be very busy. So, to the point : By default, the net-snmp port installs the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd.sh scripts, which binds a snmpd daemon on every interfaces. The point is, I suppose many install this port to have the client part rather than to have an snmp agent on their FreeBSD box. While this is not a big deal, I think anyway this is not a good idea, and that many users are and will be bitten by this behavior. I don't think it's a good idea to have a port which is for many a client only one bind by default on a network port. So the options are: 1. installation of /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd.sh.sample only and let the users needing an snmpd agent to have to know how to launch the snmpd daemon. See 3 2. divide the port in a client part and a server one. This means more work for the maintainer 3. bind the snmpd daemon on the loopback interface only, and let the ones who need an agent to configure it regarding their needs. After all if they don't know how to do that one can suppose they have nothing to do with an snmpd daemon no ? :) I have no preference, and I am definitly not the maintainer of this port, but I would like to know what other people think about this minor issue. regards, - yann PS : keep me cc:ed, I am not on the list To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message