From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 15:54:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E9416A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:54:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gulfgate-inc.com (mail.gulfgate-inc.com [64.1.98.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A251543D2F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mpf@inodes.us) Received: (qmail 38361 invoked by uid 85); 23 Jun 2004 15:53:36 -0000 Received: from mpf@inodes.us by mail.gulfgate-inc.com by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.4):. Processed in 0.042132 secs); 23 Jun 2004 15:53:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.0.4) by 192.168.0.40 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2004 15:53:36 -0000 Message-ID: <40D9A796.2070409@inodes.us> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:53:58 -0500 From: Matt Freitag User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20040623153801.7EB1F43D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040623153801.7EB1F43D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: waiting on sbwait X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:54:10 -0000 I'm not sure if it's what you're hitting, but Perhaps the sysctl "kern.ipc.maxsockets" needs to be raised, though it seems like you'd need a decent amount of concurrent active sessions to reach this ceiling. Also it's read-only, so you'll want to tune it in loader.conf. -mpf Danny Braniss wrote: >Hi, > We have a host running samba under -stable 4.10, and quiet frequently >it becomes uresponsive, hitting ^T gives > >load: 0.00 cmd: ls 12807 [sbwait] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 160k > >so my guess is that we are running out of some resource (socket buffer). > >so, if this is true, is there some sysctl to increase? > >danny > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >