From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 16 00:43:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA24923 for current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from jhome.DIALix.COM (root@jhome.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.69]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA24917 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from peter@localhost) by jhome.DIALix.COM (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA05499; Sat, 16 Dec 1995 16:42:50 +0800 (WST) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 16:42:50 +0800 (WST) From: Peter Wemm To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: KATO Takenori , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is the Linux emulator not working for you? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 16 Dec 1995, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Dec 1995, KATO Takenori wrote: > > I have rebuilt everything (kernel, include, lkm, lib, bin, sbin, > > usr.bin, usr.sbin and so on), but Executor/Linux (QMAGIC a.out) > > doesn't work as I have reported. Unfortunately, I didn't run it > > before 1TB support, so I can't compare with old kernel. (I have not > > succeeded install linux emulator in a 2.1 box yet, so I can't check in > > 2.1 box.) > > Thats very strange. I've had executor/linux working for a few days now. > (I installed one of the older vers from sunsite and it was pretty fast, > upgraded to the newest one from Ardi (or whatever) and its a little choppy > now. Or maybe its just me...) > > Anyhow it works on 2.1 here. (Are you saying "it didn't work on 2.1" or > "I haven't tried it on 2.1" either way) > > Have a good one. Oh, incidently, I glanced inside the Linux kernel while working on QMAGIC library support.. It makes reference to "Converting ZMAGIC binaries" if the file start offset is too small. I got the impression that it would be possible to convert the 1K file offset in the Linux ZMAGIC stuff to (say) 4K file offset start so that we can do proper demand paging to files rather than reading them into swap immediately... Then again, I should know better than to say things like this before checking them out... -Peter