From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 6 22:49: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D920437B41D; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:48:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA04826; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:48:46 +1100 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:49:24 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: John Baldwin , Michael Harnois , Subject: Re: mergemaster and /etc/pam.d In-Reply-To: <20020107004321.GC41085@nagual.pp.ru> Message-ID: <20020107174714.O604-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 17:12:56 -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 05-Jan-02 Michael Harnois wrote: > > >> I don't think pam.d is installed right now by default. > > > > > > Hmm. I'm not sure how it got installed on my system at all, then ... > > > > mtree creates the directory but the current makefiles don't install anything > > in the directory. > > There is error can sneak here easily. If /etc/pam.d directory even exist, PAM > ignores /etc/pam.conf contents. I think only old versions of PAM (ones from before there was a pam.d subdirectory) do that. Creating /etc/pam.d instantly broke all PAMmed applications. But they work now. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message