Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:14:22 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/39444: rc.sendmail syntax error: cannot disable sendmail Message-ID: <20020619181422.GA6026@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <15632.51243.373927.477888@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <3D0FB406.83DE356D@lbl.gov> <20020618155900.O2483-100000@master.gorean.org> <15632.6996.519381.823439@horsey.gshapiro.net> <3D102055.F08DD2AE@FreeBSD.org> <15632.9131.365021.260177@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020619104912.B41546@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020619180121.GA5897@starjuice.net> <15632.51243.373927.477888@horsey.gshapiro.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/06/19 11:06), Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > [1] Note that even before I touched this, sendmail_enable=NO didn't mean > don't start any sendmail daemons. This was broken when Peter added > sendmail_outbound_enable. > > Perhaps I should just give up and make sendmail set-user-ID root again in > RELENG_4. That might be worth consideration, especially if it can be done in such a way that people who've adapted to the new world order won't have to revert any changes. But then what have we scored? We still have to support sendmail_enable="NONE". Don't beat yourself up over this. How many -STABLE users are really getting totally screwed by it? It's a wart, and look what we got in return -- a more secure out-of-the-box MTA. :-) -- Sheldon Hearn Postmaster - Gambling.com In systems administration, a change is NOT as good as a holiday! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020619181422.GA6026>