Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:54:18 +0200 From: Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net>, Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Status of ZFS in -stable? Message-ID: <4829735A.6080103@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <1618815695.20080513104205@rulez.sk> References: <48291889.8030406@pldrouin.net> <1618815695.20080513104205@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Pierre-Luc, > > Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 6:26:49 AM, you wrote: > > >> Hi, >> > > >> I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has been >> fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now? >> > > It's still an experimental feature in FreeBSD, though the memory > allocation issues might have been already fixed (I don't know > personally). > > Many people have reported success stories when using ZFS on FreeBSD, > however there's also plenty of them who are reporting substantial issues > when using ZFS. It's up to your own decision whether ZFS will be > feasible for you; you might want to test it before deploying it to the > production environment. > > FWIW, I've been using ZFS on two "jail servers" for months without any visible issues. 7.0-RELEASE/amd64. Hugo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4829735A.6080103>