Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:25:04 -0400
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,  "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: SIGSEGV in /bin/sh after r322740 -> r322776 update
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgkvB0odoyQZn3G=2UEWA%2B%2BqvsQC5wrYiKT4Wgf3uxMGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170822133836.GQ1130@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <20170822114627.GC1130@albert.catwhisker.org> <20170822115923.GC1700@kib.kiev.ua> <20170822122836.GH1130@albert.catwhisker.org> <20170822123449.GD1700@kib.kiev.ua> <20170822124617.GN1130@albert.catwhisker.org> <20170822131958.GE1700@kib.kiev.ua> <20170822133836.GQ1130@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 August 2017 at 09:38, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:19:58PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> ...
>> > > Ok, can you rebuild kernel and libc from scratch ?  I.e. remove your
>> > > object directories.
>> >
>> > I think I'll need a working /bin/sh to do that.  As noted, I could
>> > try the stable/11 /bin/sh; on the other hand, if it's dying in a
>> > library, that's not likely to help a whole lot. :-}
>> I highly suspect that this is not /bin/sh at all.  Backtrace strongly
>> suggests that the malloc() has issues, but again I suspect that the
>> reason is not an issue in malloc, but its use of TLS.
>
> I think I hope that this use of "TLS" is not the one associated with
> (say) SSL....  :-}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread-local_storage



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkvB0odoyQZn3G=2UEWA%2B%2BqvsQC5wrYiKT4Wgf3uxMGFQ>