From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 16 10:34:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp0.mindspring.com (smtp0.mindspring.com [207.69.200.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBCD14D2C for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 10:34:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuyman@confusion.net) Received: from confusion.net (user-2iveahq.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.42.58]) by smtp0.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00840 for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 13:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <373F013B.218753DB@confusion.net> Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 13:32:43 -0400 From: Laurence Berland Organization: B.R.A.T.T. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: EGCS/GCC 2.95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following is taken from http://egcs.cygnus.com/gcc-2.95/schedule.html i386-pc-freebsd2.2.6 Is there any reason that they're making the new egcs/gcc (which is now one project) for 2.2.6 but not for the 3.x branch? -- Laurence Berland, Stuyvesant HS Debate <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. http://stuy.debate.net icq #7434346 aol imer E1101 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message