From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 25 16:41:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD99106564A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F8C8FC1A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.19.10.16] (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2PGfdMD052269; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:41:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Dmitry Marakasov In-Reply-To: <20090325163654.GE32386@hades.panopticon> References: <1237901632.1849.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20090325163654.GE32386@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:41:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1237999298.41376.54.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -2.062 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 195.122.204.152; Sender-helo: [172.19.10.16]; ) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:41:49 -0000 --=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dmitry Marakasov p=ED=B9e v st 25. 03. 2009 v 19:36 +0300: > * Pav Lucistnik (pav@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >=20 > Great, that was just about time. >=20 > My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear > that error logs may become far less readable with output from > multiple commands mixed together. pointyhat observes the same rules and conditions as the end user, for obvious reasons. So ports marked 'safe' will be parallelized, others will not. --=20 Pav Lucistnik It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason to regret trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or even explaining it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be grateful nothing bad has happened. -- The Register --=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknKXsIACgkQntdYP8FOsoJFbwCfZPMglxolCkg8/koEkeV35jne GT4AnRtzW6Nj6ahZJxrxx027+WHTt8WP =6pd9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr--