From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 26 03:46:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881EADA067F for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 03:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111EB64647 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 03:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k67so134243379wrc.2 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:46:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0iJXsk293xuS+PGlpxGWluhJwSAWNv0RsKAZfwPtc+k=; b=SCgYpHkvxA1PLicKxrnvCLocvFkm1IGul/DY7odhJOwF63DpozZo/WrZcTkv6Ntk8d QxU2JiyWFJrPBIzpGMDN8nmHen3zVVNh0vXTdT9M4T2vCNvsfWd+/sBSrdOaqmQbIIez f0Rv22rHt8npBuSeJK7awezKbySeN9wVYy9lqJc0Qgg0nZ16DZZcu6L1v0d4YUtTNMvb wOhk6swmf46lxNSTkacZXJ+Ll/JjsJARPNFO8Ik4/0zSX6docld4QuocwyrUKsSdYhPs SiP1rFMcWZp9BlnMOchWarcWViVmksFLmgDsplKBpEaZ6CnSqMHenzvl36NR56T364Nb 6RVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0iJXsk293xuS+PGlpxGWluhJwSAWNv0RsKAZfwPtc+k=; b=BQKWIugoaOdDWlTM7JTtBUOSpv75X3ZcHiEDT49v7Q3kalA2CnoOFrLIdt5OVBNz6n PIU2YMspGdoca+yUkQXrtuoOnCA7UW7lCX7GSCWTepla9QkhwZOgYYr/2e11xAiIIrcb yKshHNiUo+gRAzVfrwHyslI2PgZ7W7vdQ8MyHKR6RrxKu4LBq7LPDIilIjctICY3YW+l f6z3+3J2LpY9u/MXi8kis4Zc3AaYBXNAEVVIGQ+BwYNvwTFN3SbxO39OvbOhPvcgsCzx FypDeqaxeFEMH3W+6SC2et5n+j5SSAkl7Sq+ee/dYTYV0L1W1dCp1vzv5NujtXS+6QFl 7RBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwRqW+7ykqfJNfib/+EJhFZtcNBrqxi/SVALf5eSdWv9/hcwP8x 9DBa8iBCB3bwkTzXlmpNZpsaLXGtNw== X-Received: by 10.223.134.117 with SMTP id 50mr12938941wrw.62.1498448760653; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:46:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.183.138 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:45:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89.F1.03057.D331E495@dnvrco-omsmta02> References: <78.25.03057.F5ADD495@dnvrco-omsmta02> <89.F1.03057.D331E495@dnvrco-omsmta02> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:45:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ports still broken by ino64? To: Thomas Mueller Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 03:46:02 -0000 Hi, valgrind broke as part of the ino64 work :( -a