From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:27:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB9B106566B; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.itac.at (mail.itac.at [91.205.172.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D818FC1C; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.205.172.21] (helo=secure.bluelife.at) by mail.itac.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1JAM-0001Vr-7g; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:27:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:27:19 +0000 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: "Sean C. Farley" In-Reply-To: References: <29a8508a4d138cace83898e313c1c164@bluelife.at> Message-ID: <16a3b608dee102e7158815bf58dd4a8b@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4 X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.itac.at", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:36:01 -0500 (CDT), "Sean C. Farley" wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:21:31 -0500 (CDT), "Sean C. Farley" >> wrote: >>> Here is a patch that adds 2D acceleration. I am not sure if the >>> VirtualBox_LIBS.freebsd line is needed or not, but it does not cause >>> any apparent regressions. I tested this with the Nvidia driver, and >>> it shows improvement within the VM. I do not know how other drivers >>> will work. EXA may be required over XAA. >>> >>> If the patch does not make it through the mailing list filter, it can >>> also be found here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/virtualbox-2daccel.patch >> >> Thanks for the patch! It seems to build fine so I committed it to our >> testing repository [1] and will do some testing with Intel onboard >> graphics before committing it to the tree. > > You are welcome. > >> Could you please reply if you agree that your patch is under the MIT >> License [2] so that we can send it upstream? > > I thought it too small of a patch to qualify for a license, however, to > make it easier: > The patch[1] is available under the MIT license. > > Sean > 1. http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/virtualbox-2daccel.patch [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:27:20 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:36:01 -0500 (CDT), "Sean C. Farley" wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:21:31 -0500 (CDT), "Sean C. Farley" >> wrote: >>> Here is a patch that adds 2D acceleration. I am not sure if the >>> VirtualBox_LIBS.freebsd line is needed or not, but it does not cause >>> any apparent regressions. I tested this with the Nvidia driver, and >>> it shows improvement within the VM. I do not know how other drivers >>> will work. EXA may be required over XAA. >>> >>> If the patch does not make it through the mailing list filter, it can >>> also be found here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/virtualbox-2daccel.patch >> >> Thanks for the patch! It seems to build fine so I committed it to our >> testing repository [1] and will do some testing with Intel onboard >> graphics before committing it to the tree. > > You are welcome. > >> Could you please reply if you agree that your patch is under the MIT >> License [2] so that we can send it upstream? > > I thought it too small of a patch to qualify for a license, however, to > make it easier: > The patch[1] is available under the MIT license. > > Sean > 1. http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/virtualbox-2daccel.patch Thanks! I've already submitted the patch upstream and committed it to the tree a few minutes ago. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/