From owner-freebsd-security Thu Dec 25 17:27:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA12275 for security-outgoing; Thu, 25 Dec 1997 17:27:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security) Received: from gw.sut.ru (gw.sut.ru [194.190.126.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA12223 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 1997 17:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koala.lanck.ru!uwl@lanck.ru) Received: from lanck.ru (lanck.ru [194.226.196.66]) by gw.sut.ru (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA27560 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 04:24:38 +0300 Received: by lanck.ru with UUCP id EAA25843; (8.8.5/vak/1.9) Fri, 26 Dec 1997 04:20:40 +0300 (MSK) Received: (from uwl@localhost) by koala.lanck.ru (8.8.5/8.6.12) id DAA17036; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 03:45:07 +0300 Message-ID: <19971226034507.34247@koala.lanck.ru> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 03:45:07 +0300 From: Vladimir Uralsky To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: land.c patch for 2.2.5-RELEASE References: <199712232145.WAA08209@gvr.gvr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.79e In-Reply-To: <199712232145.WAA08209@gvr.gvr.org>; from Guido van Rooij on Tue, Dec 23, 1997 at 10:45:17PM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.29 i586 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 23, 1997 at 10:45:17PM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > There has been an advisory on the f00f stuff. A land advisory is in the make. > The felling is that the -current solution is not the right one. > You can apply the solution in -current to -stable though. Is it really necessary now? My system was cvsuped to -stable 2 days ago and it's steady again land. -- Vova.