From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:46:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107E516A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8F043D55 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i39JkB8a001692; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:46:11 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:46:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404091246.14178.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Andreas Davour cc: Martin Hudec Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:46:28 -0000 On Friday 09 April 2004 12:34 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk > > directory? > > No. > > > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all > > enabled? > > No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports > collections in there instead, except for arabic, hebrew and some > other exotic languages. > > Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a > vital dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup > would have included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had > been the problem. > > One should never *expect* a computer to do something I guess. > > Would something strange happen now if I added a line for > 'ports-accessability' in my ports-supfile and tried to cvsup again? > > I guess I *really* should do a pkgdb -Uu then? You have to remember the INDEX is created by make and when you leave items out, things can go to hell very quickly. If you want an real INDEX, you cvsup ports-all and don't refuse anymore than ports/INDEX. You never know when a new dependancy has been added that depends on something you don't think is important. Ports-all keeps you on top of it. Kent > > /Andreas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html