From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  8 03:08:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9F87716A4CE; Sat,  8 May 2004 03:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5ED8D43D41; Sat,  8 May 2004 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i48A8VbS096762
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Sat, 8 May 2004 12:08:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from xdivac02@localhost)
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id i48A8Vfw096761;
	Sat, 8 May 2004 12:08:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 12:08:31 +0200
From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040508100831.GA96529@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: bcopy issues...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 10:08:36 -0000

Hi

anyone has read http://gobsd.com/node/view/9 this seems quite serious
and even if it wasnt we should have mmx (+xmm) capable bcopy routines...

the code seems to be easily mergeable

any comments?

Roman Divacky