From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 15 16:11:32 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B313106566B;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F638FC08;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA21087;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:11:29 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <49E60731.8050402@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:11:29 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>
References: <49DB639A.4090504@icyb.net.ua>
	<200904141424.00943.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<49E5A200.6010306@freebsd.org>
	<200904151208.03822.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200904151208.03822.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: run resume code only for S1-S4 states
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:11:32 -0000

on 15/04/2009 19:08 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> Actually, my patch was more complex, e.g., I added more code to make 
> sure power/sleep button events get ignored and cleared when it is not 
> in S0 state, etc.  Probably I needed to track the current state 
> because of it.  I think you may ignore it for now if it is not needed 
> anywhere else.

Interesting. I think that I will go with the current patch (modulo break->goto
changes), if my mentors approve. But I would like to see your patch :-)

-- 
Andriy Gapon