From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 19 23:40:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D79A678 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36961269B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CF2F933C26; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:40:29 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: bug in dhclient / dhclient.conf / dhcp-options parser? References: <441u2cih07.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44vbzogr7g.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:40:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: (cederom@tlen.pl's message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:34:25 +0100") Message-ID: <4438msj6z6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:40:32 -0000 CeDeROM writes: > I guess this option-nnn thing should work for all values no matter > what are the names in some table :-) The ISC folks seem to agree, as they've changed their code base to do so. There are huge structural differences in the internals, though, so it's not just a matter of porting a fix. > I have used isc-42-dhcp-client and it works with the names, but it > would be nice to have it working in the base as well :-) I think my earlier message had enough detail to put out a Problem Report for the issue. If you prefer, I could come up with a patch for the actual fix, but if I did that, I would spend enough time to check *all* of the options to see which other ones might be missing, so I wouldn't come up with a PR immediately.