From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 14 5:51:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8944437B777 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:51:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e2EEDLR16845; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 06:13:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 06:13:21 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jamie Bowden Cc: Eric Wayte , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What result would *you* like from the merger? Message-ID: <20000314061321.C14789@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ragnar@sysabend.org on Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 05:44:24AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Jamie Bowden [000314 06:06] wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Eric Wayte wrote: > > :Everyone is talking about the merger, so I thought I'd start a new thread: > : > :What would you like to see from the merger? > > Enn Eff Ess. BSD/OS has working client and server locking that works, or > at least, that's what I hear. I'm looking at roughly 20k for an Origin200 > to build a file server on. I could do it with FreeBSD for a quarter of > this if I could count on NFS. Please if anything, go with Sun. IRIX nfs is nice, but not nearly as good as sun's implementation. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message