From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 25 13:41:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D56C16A418 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A513C45B for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.242.123]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAPDk1Ip042760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:46:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAPDhOla062469; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:43:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <47497B69.8080605@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:40:57 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Per olof Ljungmark References: <4748511C.1020707@netfence.it> <47496C5E.3010701@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <47496C5E.3010701@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Samba patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:41:14 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark ha scritto: > Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to >> them through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine. >> >> Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem? > > No, we are at least two :-) > Ok, thanks. Any hint on when this will be fixed? Perhaps with the update to 3.0.27a? Not that I'm recriminating, I just need to plan either an upgrade in a short time or a downgrade. bye & Thanks av.