From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 04:49:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1849716A47F; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 04:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B4813C45D; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 04:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from besplex.bde.org (c211-30-225-63.carlnfd3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.225.63]) by mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l514mvhD011981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:48:57 +1000 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:48:58 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Attilio Rao In-Reply-To: <200705312252.l4VMqGRU000594@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20070601144757.P3953@besplex.bde.org> References: <200705312252.l4VMqGRU000594@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 machdep.c pmap.c src/sys/arm/arm machdep.c pmap.c src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c src/sys/compat/linux linux_misc.c src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_misc.c src/sys/fs/smbfs smbfs_io.c src/sys/i386/i386 machdep.c pmap.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:49:01 -0000 On Thu, 31 May 2007, Attilio Rao wrote: > attilio 2007-05-31 22:52:15 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/amd64/amd64 machdep.c pmap.c > ... > Log: > Revert VMCNT_* operations introduction. > Probabilly, a general approach is not the better solution here, so we should > solve the sched_lock protection problems separately. > > Requested by: alc > Approved by: jeff (mentor) Thanks. Bruce