From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 9 21:20:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88666106566C for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com (mail-fx0-f158.google.com [209.85.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF17E8FC14 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1307582fxm.43 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:20:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dLz3JbJI4SCFign9l3JwVinBsr3ehmV/Rc2eoiI5anU=; b=JgPuMU8vZm5rzeMlgkMOeU8t9yRYZQ0xQDu9WtV0DcnYWngxLdVryO1I+F4XANo0Fy X6LCxXlSEmpDeP3tr2EACXLEohWsVao6UFhnfefyhOyo5a7qLihvKXea5XefdAXAmbgp IAona5BuuiwdtyLVpbzyinJmNxpO3w/tNAvsc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=TgClWl+qW8IiFIgSgtO8+z3EaaIhLl6+eW0d5VJkwL1C7UmQpY2Q9FitXmlS3dQaiv JREihLofffXR7SR2uTQR5dFhfGQCz2tURjXBrM3nbMnxkzPIAD3TZGwxP9aVm4Yv9Vv6 F5dLaNzb61kV0PQHk7DZPFhlDJqJp0w9qH2SA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.74.15 with SMTP id w15mr3908869fga.1.1236633633509; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:20:33 +0300 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: imp@freebsd.org, freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Unable to set devclass (devname: (null) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:20:40 -0000 Hi. Is it ok (and how much harmfull) to see this message? driver bug: Unable to set devclass (devname: (null)) P.S. This is introduced in subr_bus.c, v1.216 - PDEBUG(("Unable to set device class")); + printf("driver bug: Unable to set devclass (devname: %s)\n", + (child ? device_get_name(child) : + "no device")); where PDEBUG was moved from BUS_DEBUG to general output. -- wbr, pluknet