From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 11 10:50:10 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCF5E8E08D
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net)
Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [72.12.213.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7E08006E
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Received: from typhoon.sorbs.net
 (203-206-128-220.perm.iinet.net.au [203.206.128.220])
 by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit
 (built Jul  9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0P0S004F5MHWRH00@hades.sorbs.net> for
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 02:58:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check
To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
References: <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com>
 <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091451300.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <fe88c5e6-155d-dd64-96d5-8f394c41d92f@FreeBSD.org>
 <20171210171122.GA48536@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <EC0F9F41-4A57-4A8F-A7B4-67D954182DDA@adamw.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712110904320.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <20171211104230.GV19238@e.0x20.net>
From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>
Message-id: <5A2E625B.3020703@sorbs.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:47:55 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:43.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
In-reply-to: <20171211104230.GV19238@e.0x20.net>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:50:10 -0000

Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:09:39AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>> DMA is a phenomenal program and is totally sufficient for a large
>>> percentage of our user-base. I wasn’t aware of the lack of .forward
>>> support, and I completely agree that that’s a very detrimental omission.
>> What about its spam filtering, such as /etc/mail/access and DNSBLs etc?
>>
> pkg install $some_spam_filtering_software_of_your_choice
>
> That's not what belongs into base.
>

He didn't say spam filtering software.  Sendmail in base may be 
neutered, but it includes basic access controls and spam filtering 
rules.  Does the Dragonfly Mail Agent?

Personally I think if you remove Sendmail you should not replace it with 
something else... but then FreeBSD is not about what I want or what the 
users want anymore.

Michelle