From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 18 0:14:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F237B64F for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:14:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: from bp (helo=localhost) by relay.butya.kz with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12hSCS-000LVk-00; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:13:32 +0700 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:13:31 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Peter Jeremy , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Build status In-Reply-To: <14259.956039161@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <00Apr18.152537est.115213@border.alcanet.com.au>, Peter Jeremy write > s: > > >IMHO, it's not such a bad idea. freebsd-current _is_ the place to > >report problems with -current, why can't the report be produced by a > >daemon? All the MUA's I've ever used allowed me to delete a mail > >before reading all of it, so I don't see that having detailed > >information (at the end) is a real issue (though it might be for > >someove paying by the byte). > > I agree. As one of those who pays for an incoming traffic I'm prefer a short letter with a list of directories where warning/errors happens and an URL with full listing. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message