From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Thu Jul 7 08:41:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCDEB769FA for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092331D08 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u678fW6v053455 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:33 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Effective rule sets in a jail? References: <2aeb6798-11ee-27c0-610a-d745aa322f97@gjunka.com> <577E0A78.1040600@quip.cz> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <2c9d10fd-35ba-5470-026d-a1483e47fcf2@gjunka.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:41:32 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <577E0A78.1040600@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:41:36 -0000 On 07/07/2016 07:53, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Ultima wrote on 07/07/2016 06:04: >> Not so. The top variable, devfs_ruleset = 4 is being set as the >> default for >> all jails. The devfs_ruleset = 5 inside the brackets is changing the >> default value. >> >> How to check what ruleset is mounted? That is a great question. I'm not >> sure of an easy way to check other than verifying the /dev directory >> inside >> the jail. > > There is no way to set more than one devfs rule to jail AFAIK. > You can see the rule number in output of jls -s or jls -n. > > Miroslav Lachman > I was referring to this clause in the man document: Descendant jails inherit the parent jail's devfs ruleset enforcement. I thought that the outside rule is combined with the inside rule in the jail definition. But thanks for the hint about jls -s, it does shows the (single) active rule set (however without referring to the specific rules defined in devfs.rules or a combination of it). Grzegorz