From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 25 12:43:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA20534 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:43:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bogslab.ucdavis.edu (greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu [128.120.162.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA20529 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:43:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu) Received: (from greg@localhost) by bogslab.ucdavis.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA22303 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:43:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Greg Shenaut Message-Id: <199807251943.MAA22303@bogslab.ucdavis.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2.8--last 2.X release? To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: from "Rick Hamell" at Jul 25, 98 12:19:54 pm Reply-To: gkshenaut@ucdavis.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Rick Hamell wrote:" [I wrote:] > > The reason I ask is because I am setting up a lab full of FBSD2.X > > systems, > Actually, I think the 3.0 will be current in about October. Unless > there are some major fixes between then and now to make a 2.2.8 nessecary. This is [good] news to me. > BTW, upgrading all those computers isn't that big of a deal. Just > designate one a server, mount the 2.2.7 CDROM, and CVSUP the entire lab. > With 20-30 computers I don't see it taking more then a two days total. Hmmm--that's food for thought. Since none of the machines had anything on them before, I've been using a roll-in tape image to put a system on them. But now that they actually have some intelligence, you are right--I might be able to simplify things considerably. -Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message