From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 16 07:19:13 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9306937B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAAA43FCB
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h4GEJ9gw080812;
	Fri, 16 May 2003 15:19:10 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h4GEJ93o080811;
	Fri, 16 May 2003 15:19:09 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to
	mark@grondar.org using -f
Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h4GEIVgN072174;
	Fri, 16 May 2003 15:18:31 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
Message-Id: <200305161418.h4GEIVgN072174@grimreaper.grondar.org>
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 May 2003 09:11:18 -0300."
             <3EC4D566.5070306@tcoip.com.br> 
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 15:18:31 +0100
Sender: mark@grondar.org
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:19:13 -0000

"Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
> Mark Murray wrote:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > 
> >>Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes:
> >>
> >>>If openssl's des(1) is the same as our bdes(1) (ie, gives the same results)
> >>>then I'm in support of this.
> >>
> >>I haven't compared OpenSSL'S des(1) directly with bdes(1), but they
> >>are both ports (or reimplementations) of Sun's des(1), and I've used
> >>OpenSSL's des(1) in the past to exchange data with Solaris users who
> >>were using Sun's des(1).
> > 
> > 
> > I've converted our bdes(1) to use the openSSL library. I've also done
> > ed(1). :-). libcipher is now OBE.
> 
> 1) What happens if I compile with no crypto (whatever it is/will be 
> called these days)?

No change.

> 2) ed(1) is /bin/ed. Won't that cause trouble?

No. Instead of not using libcipher, it won't use libcrypto. :-)

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH