From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 09:21:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91F916A401 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41D13C455 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from [10.9.70.4] (c-24-20-142-99.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.20.142.99]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B1241; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:52:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45B47B4C.80004@evilphi.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:52:28 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kobus de Wit References: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> In-Reply-To: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 -0000 Kobus de Wit wrote: > It is my understanding that there is a better way for a server to > listen for traffic destined for a specific IP address than to use the ip > address alias function. Where did you hear/read this? -- Darren Pilgrim