Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:19:10 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default Xen PVM console? Message-ID: <20090524111910.GS1271@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905241043360.75344@fledge.watson.org> References: <d763ac660905232026n6542fd17k8f6c8625543be4fa@mail.gmail.com> <20090524091436.GR1271@hoeg.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905241043360.75344@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Given that there will be increasing levels of support for "pass-through" > hardware access in virtual machine environments and a trend in the > direction of virtualization-friendly hardware, we shouldn't preclude the > possibility of something a lot closer to syscons working inside of Xen in > the future. This means we should leave the syscons device names open so > that syscons can claim them if desired. Yes, exactly! -- Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkoZLS4ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwW4+ACfcHA61AElSzNFrC1YKLOr9GDV gOkAn0WMZcWbaItCSpWUgZPF4Hw7THiX =8BPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090524111910.GS1271>