From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 22 03:27:23 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id DAA27111 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 03:27:23 -0800 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA27105 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 11:27:19 GMT Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.8/jtpda-5.0) with SMTP id MAA08325 ; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:27:31 +0100 Received: by blaise.ibp.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02151; Thu, 22 Dec 94 12:27:54 +0100 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier ROBERT) Message-Id: <9412221127.AA02151@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: bidirectional ports ? To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:27:53 +0100 (MET) Cc: burg@burg.is.ge.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199412221107.WAA02772@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 22, 94 10:07:02 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23beta2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 523 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Another bug: if I run cu while rlogin'ed, it connects correctly, but > when I type "~.", both cu and rlogin exit. AFAIK it is not a bug but a feature of the rlogin protocol :-) The problem is that both cu and rlogin use the same escape mechanism... When I know that I'll use cu, I do a telnet first :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: the daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@freebsd.org FreeBSD keltia 2.1.0-Development #0: Sun Dec 11 20:52:22 1994 roberto@keltia:/usr/src/sys/compile/KELTIA i386 ctm#199