From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 20:06:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F395EF2 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8088145B for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id lj1so800786pab.12 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:05:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=huVg+C2wZkd8Sdh5U8bdU0uYQ42AFz17TZ1Qjh39O4I=; b=kQ94pOME+6RUZkrtl/KpV3ItIVhXXhY4/vn6nxhuaE63rZsX8iJRp1GzS3q3/0WURn LTCxZ8tfjRAMvkGTOQnJky+OPlTEauKESgvgUrWGqz62DrDQFYgQ/fUXABy+19HXj5Yu Z/CbZgyz/AwK3YzXfwIHEUnSvIF/oAYe03lsbrCWTUv905a0Lktz4QHOQyUCF+0k73mN pCDmDqDPNO6Zse550ds//MksODNQjrg2MhBnEOwfD0deDOc+beWyIE09jHDeYHk+t3Wl PdTa0RxM+86pINkHC5JMN50QI5wF1Pp7jLi2IycLW3xoBTJGlSpoVdYans1L75+X0fav 4b2g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.141.231 with SMTP id rr7mr3246346pab.41.1390939080762; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:58:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.155.38 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:58:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:58:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison From: Aryeh Friedman To: Andrea Brancatelli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:06:05 -0000 It would be interesting to know to how much and what extent various fronends (openstack, cloudstack, petitecloud, etc.) effect performence... I suspect that even though bhyve is slower then VMWare that VMWare's front end is the cause and not VMWare itself.... for example I suspect that bhyve with petitecloud on top would be much faster then vmware or qemu with openstack or cloudstack. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Andrea Brancatelli < abrancatelli@schema31.it> wrote: > Hello everybody. > > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-) > > > http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-= 5-comparison/ > > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! > > Thanks for your time. > > -- > > > > > *Andrea BrancatelliSchema 31 S.r.l. - Socio UnicoResponsabile ITROMA - > FIRENZE - PALERMO ITALYTel: +39. 06.98.358.472* > > *Cell: +39 331.2488468Fax: +39. 055.71.880.466Societ=E0 del Gruppo SC31 > ITALIA* > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org