From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 09:35:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB60106564A for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe02.swip.net [212.247.154.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF6D8FC2E for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=1Vylc-1sXicA:10 a=c1mOR_-mYvwA:10 a=nklthdr5v5AUSfVrlghuJA==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=JXCY6yMNjKbup46Pfq8A:9 a=jLxND2J32jdERcnkm64A:7 a=VkledWJT8NGMrJ_d9TWteUIlTSsA:4 a=mABBJHOAw2oA:10 a=u-1G2w-SAyoA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from [62.113.132.62] (account mc467741@c2i.net [62.113.132.62] verified) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 1185935962; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:35:25 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Andre Guibert de Bruet Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:37:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <24019.1232155811@critter.freebsd.dk> <129DC2F8-C5ED-4382-957A-29B5DBE2FCC9@siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <129DC2F8-C5ED-4382-957A-29B5DBE2FCC9@siliconlandmark.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901201037.49841.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:35:28 -0000 On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message > > > A42CF4263B9E@siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de Bruet writes: > >>>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? > >>> > >>> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that > >>> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. > >>> > >>> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID > >>> specification. > >> > >> PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind > >> committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to > >> produce the bits required for usb2 as well? > > > > USB2 patches should go to HPS@ still I think ? > > I have attached the 4x20 quirk patch for hpsusb. > Hi, Committed to P4. And my private SVN. Will go into -current early next week. http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=156420 --HPS