From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Feb 13 14:58:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A431C4257 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca6-93.ix.netcom.com [205.186.213.93]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA71807; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id OAA12720; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:04:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Torsten Blum Subject: Re: zsh re-org References: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> <20000212182711.A42371@dragon.nuxi.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 13 Feb 2000 14:04:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2000 18:27:11 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "David O'Brien" * And Satoshi can override your objections if it is deemed you have stopped * maintaining it in any real sense of the word. Err.... Can you guys calm down? Nobody's gonna die whether zsh-devel is beta or not. ;) Torsten, I am not going to strip your maintainership at the moment but please try to respond sooner to reports. As for zsh vs. zsh-devel, they can stay the way they are, there appears to be enough objections to change the default behavior. Ok? -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message