From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 16:40:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAF116A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D5D43D1F for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:40:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i54NeQr7014243 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i54NeQ1q014242; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200406042340.i54NeQ1q014242@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: ports/67564: repocopy net/samba-devel -> net/samba3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 23:40:51 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/67564; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/67564: repocopy net/samba-devel -> net/samba3 Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 01:39:17 +0200 Hi! I would question overall stability of Samba 3.0.x, but in general, I like the idea, especially, in the net/samba3 -> net/libsmbclient bit. So, I approve repocopy of net/samba-devel into net/samba3. After that I'll make necessary adjustments to the port itself and slave ports(in fact, for slaves only SAMBA_PORT variable should be changed - commiters, you can do it :)). Developent version, possibly should be called net/samba3-devel though to avoid the confusion with net/samba(yes, it's stable, but names should be consistent). With regards, Timur Bakeyev.