From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 8 18:15:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA28473 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 18:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA28467 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 18:15:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA26740; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 18:15:15 -0800 To: chrisc@MAIL.bbcc.ctc.edu cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Project Project In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 1996 16:11:48 GMT." Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 18:15:15 -0800 Message-ID: <26738.821153715@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Jordan, I checked out the chapter 15 stuff and I want to keep up the " > Not Urgently" needed section. > > I made some modifications to it on my machine just to show you what > I am proposing to do. Basically im I like the basic construct, though I think instead of listing all the people involved (since this may change frequently) you should just list the `contact person'. This person will know more about the current composition of the development team and can fwd appropriate comments to the other interested parties. I think the `sign me up' should also point to the contact person in question (though I like the idea of there being a separate button for it). Unowned projects should probably be `assigned' to hackers@freebsd.org Jordan