From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:44:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E2CF3C for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1BEB50 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8UKieOt066500 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:44:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193873] [PATCH] Unify dumpsys() under generic kern_dump.c. Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:44:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jhibbits@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:44:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193873 --- Comment #4 from Justin Hibbits --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #3) > (In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #1) > > Instead of wrapping with DUMPSYS_HAS_*, why not add wrapper functions in the > > md headers, most of which simply call a common routine, with the oddballs > > doing their own thing? > > Is this something like what you had in mind? http://dpaste.com/0QRFFAS > > It's a rough sketch and I haven't tried to compile it. Just want to make > sure it seems reasonable to you before going down that path. Thanks! Looks reasonable to me. Thanks for doing this work! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.