From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 17:13:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99B41065670 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barney_cordoba@yahoo.com) Received: from web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.97.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BEDD8FC26 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barney_cordoba@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 59175 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Mar 2008 17:13:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=QsNW/DN1N2aQDZrkBjDxacunrjxrfaM39kuMfkdI31NYkqizGVs7tzwnOZf+6NhPrATWb5yyWeCyqqDAtRhvgl+aA6VxOP0eLgCUBoFr4I/KcFnhorRQQnB9CmCTSet6uPq1KgQH60OfnzyhTk3L344HbZF9tG9/WBpkU28CCRY=; X-YMail-OSG: dlUxOJ4VM1lP4C0SxMtouIyTkVaczqzcQlx0EQw6u_scOE0bY7PXdtibu5KSseOUZgsUGfQtwoA5Z7Xarqz6WFykuZsrJLMSKAxG9DMS4dzkcuvrGA7aN6txf2KYstKrGA7NAc5swOTxGTc- Received: from [98.203.28.38] by web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:13:51 PST Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:13:51 -0800 (PST) From: Barney Cordoba To: current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <528433.47985.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Cpu Usage in 7.0 doesn't add up X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:13:52 -0000 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 1 25:08 96.19% idle: cpu1 12 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 0 22:59 73.68% idle: cpu0 31 root 1 -68 - 0K 8K - 0 3:15 27.49% em0 taskq 32 root 1 -68 - 0K 8K - 1 1:05 8.15% em1 taskq It seems that the usage doesn't quite add up on a system thats just passing a bunch of data. The system shows 35.5% usage and only 30.2% non-idle. Which is likely to be more accurate? I'd assume the em0 and em1 usage numbers. Barney ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs