From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Sep 11 05:35:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA18539
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA18515;
          Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA20965;
	Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709111237.FAA20965@implode.root.com>
To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@dcfinc.com>
cc: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
        Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: *tetris* files removed from cvs repository... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Sep 1997 00:34:35 MDT."
             <199709110734.AAA25830@freebie.dcfinc.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:37:04 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>At 09:20 AM 9/11/97 +0400,<ache@nagual.pp.ru> wrote:
>>I don't understand why it is removed and not renamed instead.
>>Is it supposed to come back under different name?
>>The code itself is written from scratch and _not_ illegal.
>
>It would seem to me that a simple re-name would take care of the legal issues.
>Call it "breakout".  :-)

   It's possible that after the code has been sanitized of "tetris" that it
could come back under a different name. This will require source changes 
and is not a concern right now, however. We were compelled to take immediate
action.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project