From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 20 14:11:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA93416A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from access.lozenetz.net (access.lozenetz.net [80.72.64.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFA2543D1F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from valqk@lozenetz.net)
Received: (qmail 94324 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 22:11:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.1?) (192.168.0.1)
  by upper.lan with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 22:11:54 -0000
From: Anton Blajev <valqk@lozenetz.net>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1077315102.75490.3.camel@valqk.upper.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:11:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: NAS-Port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: valqk@lozenetz.net
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:11:57 -0000

Hello there, 
It's me again :)

I'm writing with an idea, 
As we saw NAS-Port is not obligatory, it's used to say about the port
client's using to connect, okay...
but why ins't ppp sending 
NAS-Port = tun0 for example (with the other type value:
something like this:
NAS-Port-Type = "Virtual"
NAS-Port = "tun0"
)

Wouldn't this be good to be done , because freeradius (and myabe other
radiuses) are using NAS-Port for unique identifyer to give an ip
addres... so there are no duplicates...

So, I'm asking... wouldn't be more proper and accurate ppp to send
NAS-Port = tun or it's being done on purpose not to do this.