From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 23 19:36:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C944516A41C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB5043D4C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B736460FE;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:36:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8203360FA;
	Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:36:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0DFAE33D39; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:36:23 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com>
References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0866@mvwcim1a.acuson.com>
	<200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:36:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com> (Andrew L. Gould's
	message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:48:06 -0500")
Message-ID: <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no
Cc: Johnson David <davidjohnson@siemens.com>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org,
	'cali' <calculus@softhome.net>
Subject: Re: Explaining FreeBSD features
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:36:35 -0000

"Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> writes:
> On Thursday 23 June 2005 12:16 pm, Johnson David wrote:
> > If by "works", you mean people leave the community, then you are
> > correct. We all know what "F" in "RTFM" means. While we may not say
> > it with those words anymore, we still often say it with the same
> > abusive attitude. It's far more productive to say "RTM" than "RTFM".
> I have, on occasion, used "RTFM", ignoring the "F"; but not thinking
> about whether the reader would ignore it as well -- poor form on my
> part.  I will certainly drop the "F" in the future.

Why?  Everybody knows the F stands for Fine :)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no