From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 19 9:10:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from value.net (value.net [209.182.128.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ED414D40 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from monkeys.com (i180.value.net [206.14.136.180]) by value.net (8.8.7/8.7.4) with ESMTP id JAA11192; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monkeys.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by monkeys.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA28314; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:11:37 -0700 To: Ladavac Marino Cc: Dan Nelson , Greg Lehey , Thomas David Rivers , mistwolf@ethereal.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A suggested kernel enhancement relating to kernel panics. In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:15:08 +0200. <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C1100276179685@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:11:37 -0700 Message-ID: <28312.929808697@monkeys.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C1100276179685@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>, yo u wrote: >> I suspect that the earlier panics and/or spontaneous reboots I was >> seeing >> much have been due to _some_ very obscure kernel (or perhaps even CPU) >> bug >> that _only_ makes itself apparent under _very_ heavy interrupt loads. > [ML] Or high network load--IIRC, you need mbufs for TCP >fragment reassembly as well. Try netstat -m to find out the IP memory >usage. I believe that I have plenty of mbufs. The kernel is configured with: options NMBCLUSTERS=24576 Shouldn't _that_ be enough?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message