From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 31 8:32:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f160.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.160]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4D337B40A for ; Fri, 31 May 2002 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 31 May 2002 08:32:28 -0700 Received: from 63.170.174.190 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:32:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [63.170.174.190] From: "Jon Larssen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW + NATD + stateful ruleset? Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:32:28 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2002 15:32:28.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F4DBCD0:01C208B8] Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, from reading the list archives it seems that currently a stateful IPFW rule in a box that also does the NAT doesn't work well. Granted, I need to study more on the subject; but, can I still use a stateful rule in the non-NATted interface? (the public one) Best regards, Jon. (Enjoy the World Cup) _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message