From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Aug 18 13:19:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592BA15A64; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:19:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: (from fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA08423; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:18:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:18:19 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Nik Clayton Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Default FDP docs installation directory? Message-ID: <19990818151819.C2750@futuresouth.com> References: <19990818121931.A4266@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990818121931.A4266@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>; from Nik Clayton on Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 12:19:31PM +0100 X-OS: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 12:19:31PM +0100, a little birdie told me that Nik Clayton remarked > > Does anyone have any objections to /usr/local/share/doc/fdp/ as the root > path for the documentation? 'fdp' is a little bit cryptic, but I like > TLAs, and the only other alternative I could think of ('docproj', or > 'doc-proj') is quite ugly. Why /usr/local/share instead of /usr/share? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Unix Systems Administrator | fullermd@futuresouth.com Specializing in FreeBSD | http://www.over-yonder.net/ FutureSouth Communications | ISPHelp ISP Consulting "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message