From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 26 11:16:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA09099
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA09094
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15379(5)>; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:15:25 PST
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177478>; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:15:11 -0800
To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
cc: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Restricting ping -s and -l 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 Mar 96 03:03:40 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960326130044.26723A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> 
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 11:15:02 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <96Mar26.111511pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.960326130044.26723A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> you w
rite:
>How about a special flag to tell it not to be *so verbose*?

Can you live with "ping -q", or do you really want another flag to say
"print out echo responses but not error messages"?

  Bill