Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:11:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193294] [maintainer] graphics/repng2jpeg better conformity upgrade version to ???? Message-ID: <bug-193294-13-MTae5ErfSg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193294-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193294-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193294 --- Comment #8 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #7) > Sure. I get it. Given the source is now in my control. Future > version(s) will use a more FreeBSD friendly naming scheme. :) I haven't said anything about the naming scheme. I am objecting, strongly, to you changing the source without using patches or a new version. There are 3 outcomes here: 1) you revert the distinfo file and provide patches instead 2) You updating the source to change the version number, re-roll the tarball, and update the version on the makefile and regenerated the distinfo 3) you withdraw the PR. What you have here is unacceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193294-13-MTae5ErfSg>