From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 6 23:44:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6616A4D4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 23:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2559643DBF for ; Fri, 6 May 2005 23:44:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425B34BD6E; Sat, 7 May 2005 01:42:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 01:46:34 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050506234634.GB10597@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20050506105722.099954BEAD@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <94a56a65c9550600c114e053bc08456f@chrononomicon.com> <1305875013.20050506203538@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1305875013.20050506203538@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 23:44:44 -0000 On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:35:38PM +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > When you sign up to a mailing list, you implicitly give permission to > distribute your posts to other members of the list. You do _not_ give > permission to have your posts archived, and you do _not_ give permission > to have your posts published and made accessible to people who are not > on the list. Anthony, mailing lists of OSS projects have been archived for a very long time now. Anyone who doesn't know that, would have been living under a rock. People trying to argue against this overly widespread modus operandi of OSS mailing lists in a court of law would have a real hard time to convince the judges that such comments which have been committed to public mailing lists may not be archived under fair use provisions. Fafa has no chance to revoke his postings entirely -- no matter how much litigation he deems necessary to initiate -- because they are spread all over the mirrors in more jurisdictions than he can even dream of. Anyone trying to squeeze this back just makes a fool out of himself and loses time and money. Anyway, this thread is becoming increasingly burocratic. Please take it to -advocacy@ or -chat@ or, better yet, let it die. Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/