From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 20:31:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA01122 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 20:31:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from brooklyn.slack.net (brooklyn.slack.net [206.41.21.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA01117 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 20:31:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrewr@brooklyn.slack.net) Received: from localhost (andrewr@localhost) by brooklyn.slack.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA01716; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 23:38:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 23:38:48 -0400 (EDT) From: andrewr To: ben@efn.org cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible security "risk" in ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Ben wrote: > Maybe I'm mistaken, but ps(1) get's the info from /dev/kmem and /dev/mem and > formats them according to /kernel, what would I need to patch? su to a normal user, and: cd /proc ls -al cd cat status > > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, andrewr wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Ben wrote: > > > > > For ps I made a patch that allows only root(or wheel, you pick) to use the > > > flag '-a', otherwise the user attempting to use '-a' only gets his/her proc's. > > > > Did you patch the kernel as well? Caue if you didn't, it's useless. > > -ben@efn.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message