From owner-freebsd-sparc Mon Mar 25 13:35: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7C137B420 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:34:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2PLYMo50315 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:34:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id g2PLYLh03367; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:34:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:34:21 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203252134.g2PLYLh03367@vashon.polstra.com> To: sparc@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Subject: Re: Questions regarding CVSup port to FreeBSD/sparc64 In-Reply-To: <20020325124448.B13059@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020324181329.B15939@dragon.nuxi.com> <200203251755.g2PHtUM03024@vashon.polstra.com> <20020325124448.B13059@dragon.nuxi.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <20020325124448.B13059@dragon.nuxi.com>, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:55:30AM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > > almost never bothered to tag things or even to enter log messages when > > he committed. :-( > > One has to wonder just why they bother using CVS then.... Uh-huh ... > > What's the point of getting the diffs anyway, though? > > It would not be the first time I've checked out an early version of GCC > from the FSF repo, applied local changes and walked them forward. If it > would help the effort, I am willing to at least give it a try. Thanks! That's nice of you. I think I didn't express it very well, but those diffs have already successfully been walked forward as far as gcc-2.95.2, which is what is used in the CM3 distribution of Modula-3. So if there is any further updating to be done, CM3 would be the best starting point. That's why I say that the old 2.7.2.1 stuff isn't worth bothering with. But first, I might as well try using CM3 with its existing 2.95.2-based code generator. If that works well enough for Modula-3, then we're done. > I guess you don't have your modified gcc-2.7.2.1 bits any more? No, that's all gone as far as I can tell. It was a long time ago. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message