From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 14:32:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1A5CA2048 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6B71BDA for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v06EWIx7022926 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:32:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211219] NIC status does not pass into a state of "no carrier" after disconnecting the cable. Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:32:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: julien@perdition.city X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:32:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211219 Julien Cigar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |julien@perdition.city --- Comment #13 from Julien Cigar --- I *think* I experienced something similar on a Soekris 6501 (amd64) recentl= y. We have two of those boxes which serve as a redundant firewall, dhcp server, local DNS server, etc.. The DHCP server is configured in "balancing mode", with something like: load balance max seconds 3; mclt 1800; split 128; Which means (more of less) that client DHCP requests are balanced between t= he two. Recently the BACKUP died (still powered on, but unreachable), but for = some unknown reason the clients which got their IPs from the BACKUP DHCP server = just "lost" it after the lease time passed.. and didn't get a new IP from the MA= STER node.. I suspect also that's because the interfaces didn't go into the "no carrier" state. This is on 10.2-RELEASE with 82574L cards. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=